Revolutions germinate from a core set of powerful higher-level ideas/ideals expressed vividly. So what fires up the savings revolutionary?
Revolutions germinate from a core set of powerful higher-level ideas/ideals expressed vividly. So what fires up the savings revolutionary?
Replication was the norm, with the average group creating nearly two additional groups in the 14 months since the project ended.
Drinking coffee on the hotel terrace overlooking an expansive lawn, a group of women caught my eye....
“How would you like it if your bank made you sit with a group of neighbors in order to carry out your banking business?” The question is asked rhetorically, and the questioner never waits for an answer…
This is a plea for us all to shut our marketing mouth for a while when we are talking about Savings Groups.
From time to time along comes a book like Katherine Boo’s Behind the Beautiful Forevers
Global Microcredit Summit 2011: At the centre of microfinance is the Client
I am perplexed by an attitude I keep running into that volunteerism isn’t sustainable.
What's the best way to keep trainers training? (Hint: they don't work for money, but they need money to work).
If I neglected to mention any model or type of organization, take that as a sign of how bearish I am about it.
I had the pleasure of being at the end of a distinguished chain passing along a new study.
IMFTI conducts research around the world, emphasizing the value of local researchers and local research partners.
Can insanely small amounts of savings really make a difference? I think the answer is Yes.
Do promoters of groups had a responsibility to layer on other activities that might ultimately benefit group members? Lively discussion among Kim, Hugh and Paul.
I'm guilty of having dissed microcredit. A lot. Here's a bit of a mea culpa, and an acknowledgement of all the good things the microcredit boom accomplished.
He explores one of the most fundamental assumptions of microfinance—that it reduces the costs of borrowing and saving for the poor.
We know that we work in situations of complexity, unpredictability. So why do we keep approaching problems and analysis in the same way?