April Fools! Yuk yuk yuk!

 

Today’s Revolutionary: Barcodes

  

 We all are familiar with the Universal Product Code, or UPC - that rectangle of white and black lines that adorn just about every product made and marketed anywhere. 

You might not know where the code came from, how it works, and what it’s impact is.

The present design was the result of a competition sponsored by the US National Association of Food Chains in 1971. Supermarkets had long dreamed of some sort of machine that could replace the laborious work of typing in prices of every item sold in a cash register. Finally, the technology caught up with the dream, and in 1972 bar codes were introduced in one supermarket in Cincinnatti in the US.

A laser swings its beam back and forth in the form of an “X”, and when the light bounces back from the barcode, a computer recognizes the pattern, and converts it to numbers, in binary code. I was surprised to learn that both the white spaces and the black spaces are conveying information: a think black line is “one”, a thicker black line is “one one”, and so on. Similarly, a think white space is “zero”, a thicker one is “zero zero”… The codes don’t carry any information about price or the product. All they do is tell the store’s computer where to look for information about the price and the product in its data base.

Depending on whether you sympathize with management or labor, you could say that bar codes enabled greater efficiency, more accuracy, and shorter waiting times - and all this is true. However, you could also point out that the bar codes put thousands of people out of work and downgraded the skills necessary for the checkers who remained (and thus the salary expectations too) - you could add that barcodes enabled people to consume more, more quickly, with less human interaction. I’ll leave it to you, Dear Reader, to decide if that is good thing or a bad thing.

Finally, before you pull out your credit card or your supermarket loyalty card the next time you buy bread and milk, you should realize that the barcodes allow the supermarket to know exactly what YOU bought, when, and what your buying patterns are over time. Basrcodes make Big Data possible, something else for you, the reader, to judge the merits of.


 

Catch up on the over 180 previous “Today’s Revolutionaries” here.

 


Search Savings Revolution

Enter search term in the box below and click on the arrow.

 

Savings Groups are catching on in Europe and North America.

Follow this movement, and maybe get involved yourself.

Start by reading the Northern Lights page of Savings Revolution.

Then, if you like, contact us below, and we can talk about how you can form your own groups. We’ll put you in touch with someone who can help you do that!

This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Favorite Sites

    Here are some other sites that Kim and Paul read, that we think you might enjoy.

    The SEEP Savings Led Working Group site. Congratulations to SEEP for putting together this comprehensive, easily accessible go-to site on savings groups. Check out their library, their report on outreach by country, and lots of other goodies.

    Making the Road - a blog by Bill Maddocks. “Through honesty, courage and persistent inquiry we learn the way forward as development practitioners and human beings.” Bill brings rich experience not just with development work, but with life, to these discussions. 

    Village Finance Blog. Brett Hudson Matthew’s thoughtful posts are grounded in an understanding of oral cultures, history, and social dynamics. Recommended for anyone trying to understand what’s really happening in savings groups. 

    Institute for Money, Technology and Financial Inclusion at UC Irvine. “Its mission is to support research on money and technology among the world’s poorest people. We seek to create a community of practice and inquiry into the everyday uses and meanings of money, as well as … technological infrastructures”. ‘Nuff said.

    David Roodman’s Microfinance Open Book Blog. David Roodman combines intelligence, honesty, and a sense of humor. He attempts to bring intellectual rigor to the analysis of the impact of financial services, and isn’t afraid to ruffle a few feathers in the process.

    Clean Air, Bright Light. This site by Savings Revolution co-founder Paul Rippey contains useful information about lessons learned in using savings groups to promote clean lighting. Still in development but check it out anyway!

    The Evidence Project. Chris Dunford was CEO of Freedom From Hunger for many years and probably more than anyone helped FFH earn a reputation of being willing to look closely at what they were doing, and whether they really were meeting people’s needs. Chris continues that role now as a blogger…

    Center for Financial Inclusion. CFI supports traditional microfinance to become more client friendly, more inclusive, and generally smarter. They have a long-term vision for the sector, and the blog attracts many good writers and thoughtful comments.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Financial Promise for the Poor 

    Financial Promise for the Poor: How Groups Bulld Microsavings is your go-to book on savings groups. Its contributors are authors you often read in this blog. It covers current innovations in microsavings happening around the world.

    Also, don’t miss…

    Savings Groups at the Frontier, the book inspired by the 2011 Savings Group Summit!

    Buy in UK or US.

    Search Savings Revolution

     
     
     
     

    Over the last twenty years, many people have become interested in helping poor people around the world get good financial services. Mohammed Yunus and the institution he founded, the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh, won a Noble Prize in 2006 for helping start a movement that has brought financial services to millions around the world. 

    Banks and microfinance institutions are one way to bring financial series to the poor. Savings Groups, managed by the members and based on savings rather than debt, are another solution. In fact, we think they’re such a good solution that they really are revolutionary.

    Savings Groups are self-selected groups of 15 to 30 women and men who get together to save and borrow. Rather than go into debt to an external institution, they manage their own savings through transparent procedures and all the money they earn through interest on loans stays in their village, and in their group.

    This seven-minute video is a great short introduction to savings groups:

    A number of international non-profit organizations work with local partners to train people in villages and cities in how to manage their own savings groups. There are now over five million savings group members in Africa alone, and the movement is also growing in Asia and Latin America. (There are even a few groups in Europe and North America).

    Savings Revolution is designed to help you learn more about Savings Groups, and to get involved with the most exciting new approach to bringing safe financial services to people around the world.

    Thursday
    Sep052013

    « Six things to be curious about »

    In the previous post, I suggested that our passionate interest in savings group models and methodology - all the boxes, books, meeting procedures, management and training structures - was fine, but perhaps was not directed towards the most important things. Continuing a conversation I’m having long distance with Candace Nelson, I came up with the following list of six questions that, to me, are much more interesting than Model and Methodology questions.

     

     

    1. Do the members of the group support each other in reaching personal and financial goals, or are they just coming together to share money? I think in the former case, the group is more likely to survive, by far…
    2. Is the commitment to save respected and supported? Is there room in the group both for members who Save To Save, and for members who Save To Borrow? Some readers know I suspect that the commitment savings aspect of Savings Groups is, for many members, the most important element, but lately I’ve seen some groups that are frenzied borrowers, where a pure saver might not be completely welcomed.
    3. What are the messages that the group has received, besides what’s in the manual? Is every trainer free to give their own messages to the group? Does the INGO care? Does the INGO even understand this question? (I’ve used the term messaging to refer to all the stuff that the trainer says that isn’t in the manual. These messages create self-fulfilling expectations among group members about the ability of the group to manage itself, to grow, to be independent, and many other things). 
    4. Do groups feel empowered to change procedures that they were taught? Empowered means here, having both the freedom and the information necessary to do so. (Another way of saying this is, Did anyone help the group think about security, or were they just told how to lock and unlock their box?)
    5. Does the facilitating agency have a carefully considered strategy to be efficient? And if so, is it to cut corners, or to have a replicable workable efficient simple model that it can turn out in large numbers, spreading fixed costs over a larger and larger area?
    6. How big is the gap within the program between what is said and written, and what is done? Said another way, the casual disrespect and bending of procedures makes management incredibly difficult and inefficient. The best programs monitor the gap between what they say and what they do, and if there is a gap, they either change what they do, or they change what they say they do.
    All these questions, to me at least, are a lot more interesting than passbooks versus ledgers and all that. 

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments (1)

    Intriguing.....we've been keenly aware for awhile about the gap between what groups write in their constitution and what they follow. We feel that it is up to us to change that behavior and have revised the manual accordingly. We've been emphasizing the concept of integrity (What I say is what I do. What I do is what I say. If I can't honor my word, I come clean about it, apologize and do what I can to make up for it.) The reaction to this is fascinating....wish someone would do studies on this type of thing as opposed to conventional 'impact'!

    Jill

    Wed, October 2, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterJill Thompson

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>